# Ainative (ainative.studio): agent-readiness 84/100, grade B

> Rank 9 of 1000 on Qomvia (rubric v2.3.0). Last scanned 2026-10-06T20:10:14.855Z. Page: https://qomvia.com/site/ainative-studio  JSON: https://qomvia.com/api/score/ainative-studio

## Summary
Category: Software and SaaS
{
  "known": false,
  "confidence": null,
  "summary": null,
  "offerings": [],
  "audience": null,
  "geography": null,
  "strengths": [],
  "unknowns": [
    "Specifics of its pricing tiers beyond the trial and $5/mo.",
    "The full list of 19 coding models offered.",
    "Details of their 'MCP hosting' or 'ZeroDB' implementation.",
    "The exact architecture and technology stack used.",
    "Customer reviews or user testimonials."
  ],
  "alternatives": [],
  "business": null,
  "competitors": []
}

## Score by group
- Machine access: 24/24
- Content legibility: 23/26
- Discovery surface: 19/20
- Identity & policy: 8/12
- Agent-facing performance: 8/8
- Agent protocols: 2/10
Failing checks:
- [improvement] No stated policy for automated access
- [improvement] No Content Signals
- [improvement] Content carries a date
- [polish] Language and market are declared
- [polish] No Link headers for agents

## Add-on packs
- E-commerce & product feeds: 37/100 (not part of the public score)

## AI mentions and rivals
Named in 2 AI assistant answers.


## FAQ
Q: Is Ainative readable by AI agents?
A: Ainative (ainative.studio) scores 84 out of 100 for agent readiness, grade B, measured 4 days ago, on 06.10.2026. 1 of 3 agent classes we test can use the site, and 0 checks currently block agents outright.

Q: What stops agents from using ainative.studio?
A: The heaviest problems are: No stated policy for automated access; No Content Signals; Content carries a date; Language and market are declared; No Link headers for agents. Each one is scored from a public HTTP response, and the fix for each is listed in the signed-in report.

Q: How is the Ainative agent-readiness score calculated?
A: Qomvia fetches public pages of ainative.studio as an AI agent would and runs the core checks every site gets across 6 groups: Machine access, Content legibility, Discovery surface, Identity & policy, Agent-facing performance, Agent protocols. Checks are weighted by how much an agent loses when they fail, and the score is expressed out of 100. E-commerce & product feeds checks are scored separately (37/100) and do not affect the public score or rank.

Q: How often is this score updated?
A: Public scores are re-checked when the site is re-scanned; tracked domains are re-scanned weekly and their owners are alerted when a check regresses. This page shows the scan from 4 days ago, on 06.10.2026.

## Related
- Leaderboard: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard — category ranking: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard/saas-software
- Score another site: https://qomvia.com/