# Citehawk (citehawk.com): agent-readiness 79/100, grade B

> Rank 22 of 1000 on Qomvia (rubric v2.3.0). Last scanned 2026-10-08T22:30:39.809Z. Page: https://qomvia.com/site/citehawk-com  JSON: https://qomvia.com/api/score/citehawk-com

## Summary
Category: Software and SaaS
{
  "known": true,
  "confidence": "medium",
  "summary": "CiteHawk is an AI visibility tool designed for brands and agencies to track their presence in AI-generated answers. It helps users understand why AI recommends them and improve their brand's visibility across multiple leading AI engines.",
  "offerings": [
    "AI Citation Tracking across 9+ AI platforms",
    "Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform",
    "Brand visibility analysis in AI answers",
    "Insights to improve AI recommendations",
    "Competitive AI visibility analysis",
    "Client management features for agencies"
  ],
  "audience": "Brands, marketing agencies, SEO professionals, brand managers",
  "geography": null,
  "strengths": [
    "Specialized focus on AI visibility and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)",
    "Monitors a wide range of leading AI platforms (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini)",
    "Provides actionable insights for enhancing AI recommendations",
    "Caters to both direct brands and agencies managing multiple clients",
    "Addresses an emerging and critical area of online presence"
  ],
  "unknowns": [
    "Specific pricing tiers or subscription models",
    "The company's exact founding date, size, or funding status",
    "Detailed technical methodology for AI citation tracking",
    "Specific integration partners beyond general AI use",
    "Public customer testimonials or case studies"
  ],
  "alternatives": null,
  "business": "Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform providing AI visibility tracking and improvement tools for brands and marketing agencies.",
  "competitors": null
}

## Score by group
- Machine access: 24/24
- Content legibility: 23/26
- Discovery surface: 15/20
- Identity & policy: 8/12
- Agent-facing performance: 8/8
- Agent protocols: 1/10
Failing checks:
- [blocker] No MCP endpoint to call
- [improvement] No stated policy for automated access
- [improvement] No Content Signals
- [improvement] Content carries a date
- [improvement] No Markdown for agents

## Add-on packs
- E-commerce & product feeds: 20/100 (not part of the public score)

## AI mentions and rivals
Named in 1 AI assistant answers.


## FAQ
Q: Is Citehawk readable by AI agents?
A: Citehawk (citehawk.com) scores 79 out of 100 for agent readiness, grade B, measured 2 days ago, on 08.10.2026. 0 of 3 agent classes we test can use the site, and 1 check currently block agents outright.

Q: What stops agents from using citehawk.com?
A: The heaviest problems are: No MCP endpoint to call; No stated policy for automated access; No Content Signals; Content carries a date; No Markdown for agents. Each one is scored from a public HTTP response, and the fix for each is listed in the signed-in report.

Q: How is the Citehawk agent-readiness score calculated?
A: Qomvia fetches public pages of citehawk.com as an AI agent would and runs the core checks every site gets across 6 groups: Machine access, Content legibility, Discovery surface, Identity & policy, Agent-facing performance, Agent protocols. Checks are weighted by how much an agent loses when they fail, and the score is expressed out of 100. E-commerce & product feeds checks are scored separately (20/100) and do not affect the public score or rank.

Q: How often is this score updated?
A: Public scores are re-checked when the site is re-scanned; tracked domains are re-scanned weekly and their owners are alerted when a check regresses. This page shows the scan from 2 days ago, on 08.10.2026.

## Related
- Leaderboard: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard — category ranking: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard/saas-software
- Score another site: https://qomvia.com/