# Mabl (mabl.com): agent-readiness 67/100, grade C > Rank 235 of 1000 on Qomvia (rubric v2.3.0). Last scanned 2026-10-23T02:50:14.427Z. Page: https://qomvia.com/site/mabl-com JSON: https://qomvia.com/api/score/mabl-com ## Summary Category: Software and SaaS { "known": true, "confidence": "high", "summary": "Mabl is a cloud-native, low-code/no-code test automation platform designed for quality assurance and development teams. It enables the creation, execution, and maintenance of UI and API tests across different browsers and devices to accelerate software delivery and ensure product quality.", "offerings": [ "AI-powered test automation", "Low-code/no-code test creation", "UI testing for web and mobile", "API testing", "Cross-browser testing", "Integrations with CI/CD pipelines" ], "audience": "Software development teams, QA engineers, DevOps teams, enterprises seeking comprehensive test automation solutions.", "geography": "Global, with a strong presence in North America and Europe.", "strengths": [ "Ease of test creation and maintenance through AI and low-code", "Robust self-healing capabilities for tests", "Comprehensive coverage across UI, API, and browsers", "Seamless integration into modern development workflows", "Scalability for large teams and complex applications" ], "unknowns": [ "Specific details of their pricing tiers", "Exact number of current enterprise customers", "Detailed internal architecture of their AI models", "Specific market share percentage within the test automation industry", "Detailed breakdown of their customer support SLAs" ], "alternatives": [ "cypress.io", "playwright.dev", "testim.io", "katalon.com", "tricentis.com" ], "business": "Mabl provides an AI-powered, low-code test automation platform for software development and QA teams to accelerate releases and ensure software quality globally.", "competitors": [ "testim.io", "katalon.com", "testsigma.com", "accelq.com", "tricentis.com", "smartbear.com", "saucelabs.com" ] } ## Score by group - Machine access: 24/24 - Content legibility: 22/26 - Discovery surface: 8/20 - Identity & policy: 5/12 - Agent-facing performance: 8/8 - Agent protocols: 0/10 Failing checks: - [blocker] No llms.txt - [blocker] No MCP endpoint to call - [improvement] No stated policy for automated access - [improvement] No machine-readable contact - [improvement] Title, description and canonical URL ## AI mentions and rivals Named in 1 AI assistant answers. - testim.io: 64/100 https://qomvia.com/site/testim-io - katalon.com: not measured - testsigma.com: not measured - accelq.com: not measured - tricentis.com: 68/100 https://qomvia.com/site/tricentis-com ## FAQ Q: Is Mabl readable by AI agents? A: Mabl (mabl.com) scores 67 out of 100 for agent readiness, grade C, measured today, on 23.10.2026. 0 of 3 agent classes we test can use the site, and 2 checks currently block agents outright. Q: What stops agents from using mabl.com? A: The heaviest problems are: No llms.txt; No MCP endpoint to call; No stated policy for automated access; No machine-readable contact; Title, description and canonical URL. Each one is scored from a public HTTP response, and the fix for each is listed in the signed-in report. Q: How is the Mabl agent-readiness score calculated? A: Qomvia fetches public pages of mabl.com as an AI agent would and runs the core checks every site gets across 6 groups: Machine access, Content legibility, Discovery surface, Identity & policy, Agent-facing performance, Agent protocols. Checks are weighted by how much an agent loses when they fail, and the score is expressed out of 100. Q: How often is this score updated? A: Public scores are re-checked when the site is re-scanned; tracked domains are re-scanned weekly and their owners are alerted when a check regresses. This page shows the scan from today, on 23.10.2026. ## Related - Leaderboard: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard — category ranking: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard/saas-software - Score another site: https://qomvia.com/