# Neastudio (neastudio.com): agent-readiness 62/100, grade C

> Rank 324 of 1000 on Qomvia (rubric v2.3.0). Last scanned 2026-09-29T16:40:17.684Z. Page: https://qomvia.com/site/neastudio-com  JSON: https://qomvia.com/api/score/neastudio-com

## Summary

{
  "known": true,
  "confidence": "high",
  "summary": "Neastudio is an architecture and interior design studio led by Nina Edwards Anker, specializing in tailored design solutions for residential and commercial spaces. The studio emphasizes sustainable, biophilic, and environmentally responsive approaches, often integrating solar technology and natural materials.",
  "offerings": [
    "Architecture Design",
    "Interior Design",
    "Apartment Renovations",
    "Custom Furniture Collections",
    "Residential Projects",
    "Commercial Projects"
  ],
  "audience": "Individuals and businesses, primarily in New York City, seeking high-end, sustainable architectural and interior design services for their properties.",
  "geography": "Primarily New York City, particularly Manhattan, with projects potentially extending to other areas for commercial or public installations.",
  "strengths": [
    "Strong focus on sustainable and biophilic design principles",
    "Expertise in bespoke interiors and custom furniture",
    "Specialization in Manhattan apartment transformations",
    "Integration of innovative technologies like solar power in design",
    "Diverse portfolio including residential, commercial, and public installations"
  ],
  "unknowns": [
    "Specific project budget ranges or pricing models",
    "Detailed client testimonials or case studies",
    "Size of the studio team or specific staff roles",
    "Exact process for client engagement and project timelines",
    "Specific industry awards or certifications not mentioned"
  ],
  "alternatives": [],
  "business": "An architecture and interior design studio providing sustainable, bespoke design solutions for residential and commercial clients, mainly located in New York City.",
  "competitors": []
}

## Score by group
- Machine access: 21/24
- Content legibility: 21/26
- Discovery surface: 12/20
- Identity & policy: 3/12
- Agent-facing performance: 5/8
- Agent protocols: 0/10
Failing checks:
- [blocker] No MCP endpoint to call
- [improvement] No stated policy for automated access
- [improvement] No machine-readable contact
- [improvement] Organisation structured data
- [improvement] No Content Signals

## FAQ
Q: Is Neastudio readable by AI agents?
A: Neastudio (neastudio.com) scores 62 out of 100 for agent readiness, grade C, measured yesterday, on 29.09.2026. 0 of 3 agent classes we test can use the site, and 1 check currently block agents outright.

Q: What stops agents from using neastudio.com?
A: The heaviest problems are: No MCP endpoint to call; No stated policy for automated access; No machine-readable contact; Organisation structured data; No Content Signals. Each one is scored from a public HTTP response, and the fix for each is listed in the signed-in report.

Q: How is the Neastudio agent-readiness score calculated?
A: Qomvia fetches public pages of neastudio.com as an AI agent would and runs the core checks every site gets across 6 groups: Machine access, Content legibility, Discovery surface, Identity & policy, Agent-facing performance, Agent protocols. Checks are weighted by how much an agent loses when they fail, and the score is expressed out of 100.

Q: How often is this score updated?
A: Public scores are re-checked when the site is re-scanned; tracked domains are re-scanned weekly and their owners are alerted when a check regresses. This page shows the scan from yesterday, on 29.09.2026.

## Related
- Leaderboard: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard
- Score another site: https://qomvia.com/