# Qa (qa.tech): agent-readiness 82/100, grade B

> Rank 15 of 1000 on Qomvia (rubric v2.3.0). Last scanned 2026-10-06T21:10:14.816Z. Page: https://qomvia.com/site/qa-tech  JSON: https://qomvia.com/api/score/qa-tech

## Summary
Category: Software and SaaS
{
  "known": true,
  "confidence": "high",
  "summary": "QA.tech is an AI-powered platform for automated software testing. It employs autonomous QA agents to perform end-to-end, regression, and exploratory tests on web and mobile applications.",
  "offerings": [
    "AI QA testing platform",
    "Autonomous QA agents",
    "End-to-end testing",
    "Regression testing",
    "Exploratory testing",
    "PR testing"
  ],
  "audience": "Software development teams, QA teams, companies with fast release cycles",
  "geography": null,
  "strengths": [
    "AI-powered test automation",
    "Autonomous agents reduce manual effort",
    "Eliminates need for hand-written scripts and selectors",
    "Supports both web and native mobile applications",
    "Integrates into development workflows (e.g., PRs)"
  ],
  "unknowns": [
    "Specific pricing models",
    "Exact number of enterprise customers",
    "Detailed funding rounds and investors",
    "In-depth technology stack details",
    "Long-term product roadmap beyond current offerings"
  ],
  "alternatives": [
    "cypress.io",
    "playwright.dev",
    "selenium.dev",
    "katalon.com",
    "testproject.io"
  ],
  "business": "AI-powered software testing platform for development and QA teams globally",
  "competitors": [
    "mabl.com",
    "testim.io",
    "applitools.com",
    "reflect.run",
    "autify.com",
    "functionalize.com",
    "aply.ai"
  ]
}

## Score by group
- Machine access: 24/24
- Content legibility: 24/26
- Discovery surface: 14/20
- Identity & policy: 5/12
- Agent-facing performance: 8/8
- Agent protocols: 7/10
Failing checks:
- [blocker] No API or feed to read
- [improvement] No stated policy for automated access
- [improvement] No machine-readable contact
- [improvement] Content carries a date
- [polish] No skills for agents

## AI mentions and rivals
Named in 1 AI assistant answers.
- mabl.com: not measured
- testim.io: 64/100 https://qomvia.com/site/testim-io
- applitools.com: not measured
- reflect.run: not measured
- autify.com: not measured

## FAQ
Q: Is Qa readable by AI agents?
A: Qa (qa.tech) scores 82 out of 100 for agent readiness, grade B, measured 4 days ago, on 06.10.2026. 0 of 3 agent classes we test can use the site, and 1 check currently block agents outright.

Q: What stops agents from using qa.tech?
A: The heaviest problems are: No API or feed to read; No stated policy for automated access; No machine-readable contact; Content carries a date; No skills for agents. Each one is scored from a public HTTP response, and the fix for each is listed in the signed-in report.

Q: How is the Qa agent-readiness score calculated?
A: Qomvia fetches public pages of qa.tech as an AI agent would and runs the core checks every site gets across 6 groups: Machine access, Content legibility, Discovery surface, Identity & policy, Agent-facing performance, Agent protocols. Checks are weighted by how much an agent loses when they fail, and the score is expressed out of 100.

Q: How often is this score updated?
A: Public scores are re-checked when the site is re-scanned; tracked domains are re-scanned weekly and their owners are alerted when a check regresses. This page shows the scan from 4 days ago, on 06.10.2026.

## Related
- Leaderboard: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard — category ranking: https://qomvia.com/leaderboard/saas-software
- Score another site: https://qomvia.com/