Head to head, rubric v2.3.0
Ottos is 20 points more agent-ready than Ackermann (74/100 against 54/100). Both scores come from public HTTP responses only.
Score your own site
Get a free 100-point agent-readiness score.
Share of each check group passed
Machine access
Ackermann 100%
Ottos 100%
Content legibility
Ackermann 77%
Ottos 85%
Discovery surface
Ackermann 0%
Ottos 65%
Identity & policy
Ackermann 42%
Ottos 50%
Agent-facing performance
Ackermann 63%
Ottos 75%
Agent protocols
Ackermann 0%
Ottos 30%
Catalogue access
Ackermann 100%
Ottos 100%
Product data legibility
Ackermann 87%
Ottos 67%
Agent-commerce protocols
Ackermann 0%
Ottos 30%
Checkout traversability
Ackermann 60%
Ottos 60%
Watch this comparison instead of re-checking it
Track either domain and Qomvia re-scans it weekly, alerts you when a check breaks, and shows which of the two an assistant names when a buyer asks.