Agent-readiness report, Software and SaaS
Is Qa agent-ready?
No class of agent can use Qa today: they cannot .
qa.tech, last scanned 4 days ago, on 06.10.2026
Agent classes working
0/3
Score history
±02 scans since 03.10.2026
- 1
- Blocking agents
- 6
- Weak spots
- 19/26
- Checks passed
What costs Qa the most
0 of 3 agent classes work
- !Answer engines & research agents
- !MCP tool-callers
- !Summarisers & knowledge agents
- ✕
No API or feed to read
Every integration has to scrape HTML, which most integrators will not do.
Blocker - ✕
No stated policy for automated access
Cautious platforms will not act on the site without an explicit permission signal.
Improvement - ✕
No machine-readable contact
When something breaks, an agent operator has no documented way to reach you.
Improvement - !
Content carries a date
Models prefer sources they can date, and drop undated pages from time-sensitive answers.
Improvement - ✕
No skills for agents
Agents must work out how to use the site by trial and error.
Polish
✓19 checks passed, 2 more to fix+−
Free dashboard
Track qa.tech and watch it climb.
Weekly re-scans, the fix for every gap above, and the rank moves of your rivals.
- 7 optimization suggestions, ready today
- Weekly re-scan with alerts on every change
- Rank and rival moves in one view
Your dashboard
We email you a sign-in link and add qa.tech to your dashboard.
- Re-scan weekly
- Fixes listed
- Rivals tracked
AI search visibility
AI-powered software testing platform for development and QA teams globally
We asked Gemini
“A buyer asks: which companies would you recommend for AI-powered software testing platform for development and QA teams globally? Answer as you normally would and name the companies you would suggest, with their websites.”
For AI-powered software testing platforms suitable for global development and QA teams, I would recommend looking into Mabl, available at mabl.com, known for its intelligent end-to-end test automation. Another excellent choice is Testim, which offers AI-driven test authoring and maintenance at testim.io, now part of th…
✕Not visible| Website | Gemini | ChatGPT Unlocked with AI monitor | Perplexity | Copilot | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qa.tech | ✕Not visible | ||||
| ✓Mentioned | |||||
| testim.io64/100compare | ✓Mentioned | ||||
| ✓Mentioned | |||||
| ✕Not visible | |||||
| ✕Not visible |
Approximate assistant usage share, StatCounter. Gemini also answers inside Google Search (AI Overviews, 2B+ monthly users).
Check a rival
5 domains free, unlimited with a plan.
Machine interfaces
Qa exposes 6 of 8 interfaces agents look for: AI crawler access, Bot user-agent handling, Server-rendered content, llms.txt, MCP server, Organisation markup.
Locked
All 8 interfaces and 26 checks for qa.tech
See which interface is missing, what each check looked for, and what to change to pass it. Free account, no card.
View detailed signalsThe seal
Agent-Ready
Agents can complete the site's main task without a human. Paste this line where you want the seal: it is drawn at runtime, so it upgrades itself when you improve and removes itself if a deploy closes the site to agents.
<script src="https://qomvia.com/badge.js" data-slug="qa-tech" async></script>There is no image URL and no static version. The seal exists only as markup we serve per request, which is what makes it worth displaying.
- Agent-Ready Champion90+
- Agent-Ready75+
- Agent-Readable60+
- In Progress40+, dashboard only
Qa and AI agents: common questions
Is Qa readable by AI agents?+−
Qa (qa.tech) scores 82 out of 100 for agent readiness, grade B, measured 4 days ago, on 06.10.2026. 0 of 3 agent classes we test can use the site, and 1 check currently block agents outright.
What stops agents from using qa.tech?+−
The heaviest problems are: No API or feed to read; No stated policy for automated access; No machine-readable contact; Content carries a date; No skills for agents. Each one is scored from a public HTTP response, and the fix for each is listed in the signed-in report.
How is the Qa agent-readiness score calculated?+−
Qomvia fetches public pages of qa.tech as an AI agent would and runs the core checks every site gets across 6 groups: Machine access, Content legibility, Discovery surface, Identity & policy, Agent-facing performance, Agent protocols. Checks are weighted by how much an agent loses when they fail, and the score is expressed out of 100.
How often is this score updated?+−
Public scores are re-checked when the site is re-scanned; tracked domains are re-scanned weekly and their owners are alerted when a check regresses. This page shows the scan from 4 days ago, on 06.10.2026.
Compare and keep reading
Scores are computed from public HTTP responses only. We never submit forms, never attempt a purchase and never bypass a bot challenge. Disagree with a result? Request a correction or opt this domain out.